Biostar TA970

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TA970  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140312
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 24 '17 at 04:19
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 75.1
40% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Asus(1043 0452) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 30.8
22% 29 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 32.1
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 471
Write 425
Mixed 477
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 33
90% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 71.2
71% 115 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 136
Mixed 96.5
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.21
100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
748GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 27.9
Mixed 19.8
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.32
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 22%
LEXAR JD 360 2GB
1GB free, PID a576
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 12.3
Mixed 15
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.57
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.22
32% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
800, 667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA970 Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TA970 - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback