Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180123
Uptime	9.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '20 at 21:55
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 130 2-Core 118 74% 114 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 538 48% 404 Pts	64-Core 906 56% 906 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 443.18 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 59.4 56% 65.3 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 65.8 Splatting 69.9 56% 69 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,785 Write 686 Mixed 546 218% 1,006 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 73.6 254% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 694 DQ Mixed 687 542% 757 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 408GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 97 97 97 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 11.2 Write 142 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 96.2 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 107%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 53GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Read 13 Write 3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 0.4 6% 5.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GB 5,278 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	355x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	173x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	399x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	221x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	179x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16