Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V10.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V10.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V10.2
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170109
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 08:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 25.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
56% 113 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 511
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 102E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 7.59
6% 13.9 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 467 505 504 505 503 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,230
Write 965
Mixed 160
SusWrite 512
210% 967 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 75.1
258% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 473
444% 684 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 236%
Great: 311%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 45.1
Write 73.5
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 66.2
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 71%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
186GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 38.6
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 40.5
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V10.2 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V10.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback