Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 11:09
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 91 1-Core 158 2-Core 302 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 1,103 98% 832 Pts	64-Core 1,654 102% 1,654 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.8% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 33 34% 43.9 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 48.6 Splatting 45.3 43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 377GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 413 420 425 459 598 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,512 Write 1,773 Mixed 1,632 SusWrite 539 307% 1,364 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 58.8 236% 84.5 MB/s	DQ Read 712 DQ Write 368 DQ Mixed 801 526% 627 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 70 69 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 48.1 Write 71.6 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 76.2 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 114%
Pretec 08GB 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 8GB free, PID e166 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.7 6.8 5.8 6 8.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	2.54% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 6 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.1 9% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.54% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.7% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 23 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,328x
RTX 2080Nvidia $383Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,133x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,364x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,053x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	809x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	747x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	589x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	527x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16