Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 686
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.91
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,608
Write 2,248
Mixed 1,608
478% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 95.1
322% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 467
453% 723 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
385GB free
Firmware: AM001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 93
Write 93.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 99.4
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 130 4GB
4GB free, PID 162e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.1 8 8.1 7.8 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 21
Write 6
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.9
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 120 8GB
3GB free, PID 1623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.5 4.9 5.5 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Read 11
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.8
8% 6.35 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $418
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback