Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Blade Shadow Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	Blade ShadowM
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 2,246 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 161 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 514 40% 358 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000 8,562 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 129 Parallax 124 105% 127 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 120 Splatting 94.7 85% 105 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 1,797 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 113 119 123 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 1,797 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 256GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Blade PRXT12Y746AUZ9-J81 1x12GB 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 39.5 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 52%

Yacht

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	302x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	261x
RTX A4500NvidiaBench 146%, 1,594 samples	25x

SSD
HARDDISK 275GBQemuBench 89%, 1,797 samples	580x
HARDDISK 825GBQemuBench 88%, 37 samples	22x
HARDDISK 1.5TBQemuBench 74%, 4 samples	2x

RAM
282DEW7CTQ0QH4-0V7 1x12GBBladeBench 97%, 3 samples	3x
2UUHX2E3U314TS-2WF 1x12GBBladeBench 59%, 3 samples	2x
YN1J8O05X3T5EC-468 1x12GBBladeBench 60%, 2 samples	2x