Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu D3243-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu D3243-S1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3243-S1
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170419
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3440-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 178
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 180
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86DF) 1GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 4.81
4% 5.16 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 0.09
2% 3.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 49 14 3.7 113 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 339
Write 215
Mixed 192
SusWrite 65.6
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 12.4
51% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 55.6
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 39.8
36% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 55%
Sony Card_R/W 4GB
4GB free, PID 03cc
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.9 5 4.9 4.9 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.56% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 5
10% 9.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.8
73% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3243-S1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu D3243-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback