Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 89.6
42% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 175
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 76.3
51% 68 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 52.9
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Dis 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 36 9.2 9.5 11 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 203
Write 144
Mixed 157
SusWrite 63.7
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 10.9
42% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 17.8
25% 44 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 61%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
457GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 17.5
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 15.5
25% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%
WDC WD10 EACS-22D6B0 1TB
327GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 20.1
Write 18.7
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 15.4
24% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALiveNF6G-GLAN Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback