Alienware M14xR1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware M14xR1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M14xR1
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111224
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 17:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 131
57% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 108
23% 153 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 0491) 3GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 2.16
4% 4.54 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 14 11 113 43 4.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 233
Write 204
Mixed 198
SusWrite 38.5
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 15.6
69% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 95.7
71% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA HDWL110 1TB
557GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 27
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 28.1
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22%
Great: 51%
USB 3.0 super high speed 1TB
193GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23
Mixed 24
SusWrite 25.2
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M14xR1 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M14xR1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback