Lenovo F0EB00CQIN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0EB00CQIN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370B
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 210
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 331
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 370B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7810
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.37
Reflection 9.27
Parallax 6.34
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.4
6% 6.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AAR256GN081020030 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 780 782 420 50 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1330
Write 921
Mixed 751
SusWrite 505
195% 877 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 21.9
189% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 339
326% 500 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 163%
Great: 163%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 131 131 128 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 81.8
Write 110
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 130
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 12
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EB00CQIN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EB00CQIN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback