Acer Aspire V5-552G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5557M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 92.9
48% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 131
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Acer(1025 080F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2001.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 4.47
4% 5.78 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 8.26
5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 393
Write 178
Mixed 240
59% 270 MB/s
4K Read 9.66
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 12.4
46% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 53
62% 107 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 82%
Patriot Memory 64GB
10GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 3.73
Mixed 9.51
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.75
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.03
17% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552G Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback