Asus M5A78L-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive13.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LE  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 850
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 90.7
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 164
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2610) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 3.38
9% 9.36 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 15.6
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 41 64 63 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.2% Very poor
Read 156
Write 134
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 44.8
19% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 5.3
13% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
83GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 18 56 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 73.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 50
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 60%
MEDION WiFi HDD 1TB
409GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 24
Write 23.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 7.8
24% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 45%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
21GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.1 6.9 7.2 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.1
7% 6.58 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.6
74% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 17%
Maxtor OneTouch 300GB
43GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.8% Very poor
Read 24
Write 23.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 7.8
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.2
158% 1.7 MB/s
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
133GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 7.8
25% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LE Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback