Asus V-P8H67E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus V-P8H67E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V-P8H67E
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 13:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 189
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 471
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 951 MHz, MLim: 1089 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.78
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 12
Splatting 15.8
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 76 90 96 100 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 94
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 87.9
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 85%
Generic SD Card Reader 16GB
11GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.9 8.5 7.8 5.3 6 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 18
Write 8
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 7.4
14% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.1
177% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
371GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.5
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 37
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 9905471-011.A00LF Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H67E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback