Lenovo 81Q4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81Q4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 835
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1001
62% 1001 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.1% Very good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 106
Parallax 86.6
74% 94.2 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 83.8
Splatting 84
78% 97.7 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 289 287 264 393 682 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,045
Write 696
Mixed 501
SusWrite 393
146% 659 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 45.1
195% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 551
477% 711 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 160%
Great: 248%
HS-SSD-C100 2TB
857GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 271 389 315 332 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 444
Write 309
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 277
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
10% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81Q4 Builds (Compare 1,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81Q4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback