MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 01:51
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 736
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,215
75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 60.7
54% 63.1 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 49.3
46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1693 1989 1650 1501 1480 1497 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,214
Write 2,079
Mixed 1,741
SusWrite 1635
431% 1,917 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 63
203% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 772
563% 739 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 284%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 198 194 201 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 196
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 215 217 218 218 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
886GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 79 75 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 95.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 77.7
96% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.5
234% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback