Acer ConceptD CC715-91P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer ConceptD CC715-91P  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Sparks_CMS
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-10885M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 299
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,066
97% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 1401) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5239
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 125
Parallax 110
77% 110 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 92.4
86% 107 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2044 2052 2135 2198 2077 2017 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,559
Write 2006
Mixed 1,966
SusWrite 2,087
484% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 71.9
230% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 1,021
765% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 347%
Great: 531%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D43.23261S.005 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 26
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CC715-91P Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer ConceptD CC715-91P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback