Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 14:07
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 207
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 301
36% 280 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 31
28% 30.2 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 25.3
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS330 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP122PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 76 86 90 91 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 124
Write 220
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 99
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 20.4
89% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 80.2
65% 93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 96%
WDC WD1003FZEX-00MK2A0 500GB
75GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 78 79 78 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 65
Write 62.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 77.9
14% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
192GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 107 119 117 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 113%
WDC WD50 00LPCX-22VHA 500GB
43GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 67.3
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 70
83% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A 500GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 41 41 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 39.7
49% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
8GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 43 38 40 39 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 144
Write 78.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 48.4
82% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLJG42F-D8KBFG------ Adata 16GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback