Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 15:19
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 833
85% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 126
Parallax 130
108% 129 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 125
Splatting 103
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,419
Write 1,319
Mixed 1,146
289% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 76.8
264% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 785
640% 895 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 239%
SSK 512GB
220GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 353 353 357 356 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 359
Mixed 341
SusWrite 354
80% 352 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 44
144% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 242
177% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
137GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 138 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 136
Write 104
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 138
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
841GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 138 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 107
Write 135
Mixed 111
SusWrite 138
172% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 74%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
6GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 72.6
124% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 52%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.5 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 71.2
Write 106
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 3.6
91% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.8
387% 4.03 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.9
403% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 78%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
314GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1 0.4 0.4 0.5 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 134
Write 93.7
Mixed 76
SusWrite 6.6
93% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
209GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 57 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 69.4
Write 70
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 57
88% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 38%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
42GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 57 58 57 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 57.3
113% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
74GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 102
Write 99.3
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 83.1
122% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback