Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 LX  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 152
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 212
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.4
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 17.4
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 207 223 228 230 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 243
Write 218
Mixed 223
SusWrite 210
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 17.6
81% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 42.1
63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 99%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 6.2 7 7.1 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 18.9
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 7.1
21% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
73% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback