Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory119.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 722
65% 548 Pts
64-Core 2,070
128% 2,070 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 215
Parallax 241
123% 203 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 217
Splatting 138
159% 203 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 435 425 429 436 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 442
Mixed 364
SusWrite 432
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 34.4
120% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 124%
Fusion-io ioDrive2 Duo 2.41TB, port 0, ioDrive 1200GB
231GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1766 1771 1728 1576 1531 1560 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 49.4
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback