MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '17 at 17:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 85.4
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 144
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 144
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Palit(1569 104A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 331.82
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 104
Mixed 32
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
WDC WD32 00BEKT-00PVMT0 320GB
45GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 19.2
31% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.37
75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston DDR3 1333G 8001 AE32G1339U1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 1,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback