Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 06:55
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 241
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 871
77% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,276
79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 203
Parallax 209
157% 201 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 187
Splatting 131
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gloway STK2TS3-S7 2TB
847GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 251 446 446 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 396
Write 478
Mixed 275
SusWrite 291
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 42.3
146% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 4.4
60% 145 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 101%
NE-256 256GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 174 193 141 174 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 756
Write 602
Mixed 617
SusWrite 204
122% 545 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 46
210% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 73.6
197% 423 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 132%
Great: 234%
Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB
60GB free
Firmware: 506a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 105 118 116 95 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 274
Write 96.3
Mixed 154
SusWrite 97.4
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 23.9
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 84.2
74% 111 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 129 127 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 128
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 42.9
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback