MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7883
MotherboardMSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 01:26
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 259
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 787
75% 622 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 146
Parallax 122
110% 134 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 134
Splatting 107
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 562 579 580 575 581 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 1,013
Mixed 677
SusWrite 582
208% 939 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 53.6
210% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 452
388% 592 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 188%
Great: 283%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
187GB free
Firmware: 1122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 311 279 276 140 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 475
Mixed 364
SusWrite 246
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 36.4
135% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 207
191% 295 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
581GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 513 514 509 511 515 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 200 204 206 204 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
External USB3.0 DISK00 129,986.5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 32 27 21 33 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 40
Write 25
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 30.9
42% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 95%
ASMT ASM105x 1TB
954GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 283 290 291 288 292 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
241% Outstanding
Read 299
Write 282
Mixed 256
SusWrite 289
382% 282 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 13.5
1,971% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 17.6
2,772% 33.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 F4-3200C16-8GTZB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 F4-3200C16-8GTZB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
136% Outstanding
MC Read 48.6
MC Write 61.1
MC Mixed 50.3
152% 53.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 23
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback