ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP xw9300 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP xw9300 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 09C4h
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060126
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron 285 21 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 38.8 2-Core 77.6 37% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 126 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 100 32 28 28 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 111 Write 95.8 Mixed 101 SusWrite 63.9 21% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 26.2 87% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.6 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 32.9 27% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 91%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 54GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 55 55 54 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 55 Mixed 41 SusWrite 55 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 27GB free Firmware: 10.01E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 47.3 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 46.1 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 69GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 57 Mixed 42 SusWrite 57 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 1 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback