Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 431
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 48
33% 40 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 372 375 376 373 376 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 378
Mixed 309
SusWrite 372
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 46.5
179% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 235
198% 289 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 171 174 174 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 198
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 173
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
33GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 99 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 98.9
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 97
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
0GB free
Firmware: BF100-11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.8
Write 70.8
Mixed 44.4
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 42%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
33GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 133 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 131
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 132
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
473GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 160
Write 172
Mixed 153
SusWrite 117
112% 150 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
289% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 93%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
563GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.4 0 0 0.3 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 206
Write 214
Mixed 95
SusWrite 5.1
160% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 136 136 135 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 150
Write 136
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 135
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 136 136 135 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
Read 165
Write 173
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 134
188% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
154% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 72.1
Write 62.6
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 1.2
45% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 57%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
37GB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 37.6
Mixed 33
SusWrite 38.1
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
142% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 154
Write 166
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 119
176% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
150% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 04CD F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) - $174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback