Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '17 at 22:10
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 130
60% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 448
41% 346 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 91.6
55% 76.2 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 57.4
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Axiom Signature Series III SSD 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 604ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 469
Write 206
Mixed 277
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 11.2
72% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 10.3
27% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 79%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 52.8
Mixed 20.6
31% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 51%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 45.8
Mixed 19.7
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 51%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 52.5
Mixed 27.9
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.34
100% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback