Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 07:55
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 255
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 48.9
1-Core 12.4
2-Core 23.2
22% 28.2 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 54.8
4% 38.1 Pts
64-Core 33.4
2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.64 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 156 166 89 152 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 168
SusWrite 140
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.4
39% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.8
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 58.6
49% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 117%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
213GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 95 96 96 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 75.6
Mixed 67
SusWrite 93.2
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
62GB free
Firmware: 19.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.9
Write 72.1
Mixed 52.1
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
ST316081 3AS 160GB
31GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 16.9
Write 18.5
Mixed 15.9
22% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB
46GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 19
Write 19.3
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 0.3
18% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 19%
ST316021 2ACE 160GB
146GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.04% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 19.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 2.5
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 7.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback