| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Intel SHARKBAY (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160603 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '17 at 01:51 |
| Run Duration | 295 Seconds |
| Run User | CHN-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.3%
Good
|
62% 92.4 Pts
|
18% 141 Pts
|
9% 140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4156
|
1.92%
Terrible
|
2% 2.87 fps
|
2% 2.63 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.9%
Below average
|
30% 135 MB/s
|
59% 26.2 MB/s
|
14% 30.3 MB/s
|
|
|
5.87%
Terrible
|
12% 12 MB/s
|
24% 2.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron CT51264BF160B.C16F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
28.3%
Poor
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
91% 44.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 300 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 30x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 75x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $141 |