Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 143
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 418
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.5
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39
Splatting 37.1
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
82GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 157 173 170 168 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 207
Write 183
Mixed 177
SusWrite 162
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 17.4
79% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 20.1
24% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 91%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 99 140 153 159 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 133
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 134
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
888GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 68 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 68
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
908GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 68 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 84.3
Write 83
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 67.9
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.9 7.7 7 8 8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.7
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 8%
118GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 17
29% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 33%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
2TB free, PID 2323
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 111 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 83
Write 104
Mixed 69
SusWrite 110
128% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback