Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 20:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 120
52% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 499
44% 374 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 107GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 95 88 95 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 280
Write 135
Mixed 312
SusWrite 94.7
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 16.6
59% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 77.8
61% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB
54GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 91 87 95 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 270
Write 266
Mixed 299
SusWrite 91.8
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 13.1
52% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 77.3
61% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 78%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB
147GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 92 85 95 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 271
Write 320
Mixed 295
SusWrite 92
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 14.4
53% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 81.1
63% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
3968, 28800 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 30.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback