ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell System XPS L702X (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0XN71K
Memory	0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '15 at 14:37
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 60.2 2-Core 145 45% 103 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 393 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 31% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 04B8) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5560 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.81% Terrible	Lighting 5.37 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 3.59 4% 4.97 fps	MRender 7.62 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 7.87 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.81% Great: 5%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 04B8) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2828 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 11 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 44 51 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 614857704	74.1% Very good	Read 502 Write 398 Mixed 412 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 16.4 84% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 94.6 77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 53GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 190 1241 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 652 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 650 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 58 47 840826922 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 309 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 22 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1873 (C2) HDA temperature 105 94 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.8% Average	Read 65.3 Write 101 Mixed 92 65% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.29 103% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 71%
Innostor IS888 USB bridge 640GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 183GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 56.5 Write 62.1 Mixed 56.6 76% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.34 69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	240x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	165x
Core i7-2720QMIntel $85Bench 58%, 7,798 samples	48x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	242x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	239x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	67x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	38x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $276

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback