HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2266
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 13:53
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 73.8
36% 56 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 126
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 2266) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.06
2% 3.56 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.57
2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03170007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 39 44 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 389
Write 319
Mixed 253
SusWrite 83.5
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 117
93% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 9905469-143.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback