Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '20 at 04:13
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 213 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 673 64% 531 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.3% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 36.3 29% 33.7 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 33.7 29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 232 207 199 217 190 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 424 Write 361 Mixed 189 SusWrite 206 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 82.9 4K Mixed 37.1 132% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 111 103% 157 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 105%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 13 16 16 14 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	6.38% Terrible	Read 19 Write 13.5 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 13.5 17% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.38% Great: 8%
OWC Express USB 3.0 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 86GB free, PID a0a9 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 256 260 276 269 277 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	219% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 265 Mixed 203 SusWrite 260 320% 224 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 21.4 2,277% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 21.1 2,748% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 219%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB 5,242 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	871x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	715x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	545x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	457x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	425x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	405x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	115x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16