Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101223
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 10:23
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5550
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.6% Good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 137
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2738) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.22 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 93 73 83 80 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 334
Write 139
Mixed 187
SusWrite 85.5
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 32.9
110% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 170
130% 179 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST98823AS 80GB-$121
6GB free
Firmware: 7.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 23
Write 25.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 23.4
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 21%
ASMT 2115 5TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 39.7
118% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
144% 1.8 MB/s
MB3000GCWLU 3TB
131GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 148
Write 141
Mixed 72
SusWrite 39.9
126% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.37 MB/s
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
185GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 9.2 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 95.3
Write 96.3
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 17.3
83% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 48%
ASMT 2115 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 116 121 122 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 155
Write 167
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 109
170% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 68%
ST3000DM 001-1E6166 3TB
73GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 9.3 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 50.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 17.4
60% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
294% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 94 95 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 74
SusWrite 93.1
130% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
113% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 54%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
42GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 12 12 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 188
Write 150
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 12.9
125% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 2TB
431GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 44 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 123
Write 126
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 38.9
118% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
147% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback