| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus P53SJ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK P53SJ |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120426 |
| Uptime | 16 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 12 '17 at 07:56 |
| Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
53%
Above average
|
54% 83.7 Pts
|
20% 159 Pts
|
11% 179 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 1682) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654
|
1.95%
Terrible
|
2% 2.29 fps
|
2% 2.63 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
110% 494 MB/s
|
129% 44.5 MB/s
|
41% 77.4 MB/s
|
|
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 500GB
173GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
28% 23.2 MB/s
|
55% 0.65 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-107.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.5%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
51% 78.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P53SJ Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus P53SJ
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 4x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $225 |