Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 13:37
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$54
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 211
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 460
62% 460 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 18.2
15% 17.6 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 16
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ncsc51ad 240M4P 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 69 105 8 4.1 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
Read 459
Write 286
Mixed 229
SusWrite 70.5
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 18.2
107% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 47.4
DQ Mixed 11.1
33% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
NCSC51AD240M4P 240GB
125GB free
Firmware: S8FM08.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 296 295 296 297 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 468
Write 299
Mixed 216
SusWrite 293
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 18.5
107% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 57
79% 144 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 5.7 4.9 6.4 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 12.5
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 7.7
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
90% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 9%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
2GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 18.2
Mixed 2.5
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 6,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback