Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 05:37
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 510
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 360 360 359 363 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 366
Mixed 318
SusWrite 360
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 31.4
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 266
224% 327 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
4GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 6 4.4 6.4 3.9 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 4.7
6% 3.92 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.5
171% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 17%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 19.9
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 21.6
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 21%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB
118GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 22.6
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 2.8
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 11.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback