MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 813
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 220
Parallax 210
167% 212 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 223
Splatting 148
166% 212 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 288 286 277 282 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1,376
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 319
272% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 73
236% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 824
598% 784 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 211%
Great: 280%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 463GB
199GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 521 524 524 525 521 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 171
Mixed 102
SusWrite 520
107% 495 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 26.5
83% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 168
168% 281 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 537GB
497GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 35 32 34 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,425
Write 684
Mixed 339
SusWrite 35.1
135% 621 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 19.5
89% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 197
181% 289 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 137%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
716GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 169 169 169 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 139
Mixed 104
SusWrite 169
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2800 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 2800 C16 Series 20GB
2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 34.7
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 26
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback