Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 128 56% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 347 39% 304 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 30.3 35% 33.9 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 36.7 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 96 103 107 64 6.8 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 228 Write 213 Mixed 203 SusWrite 77 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 14.6 79% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 17.6 25% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 103 107 65 7.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 80.6 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 105 104 106 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 189 Write 148 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 105 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 105 104 105 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 105 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 608GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 103 Write 50.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 102 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%
ST332031 1CS 320GB 298GB free, PID fcd4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 28 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 10.3 29% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s

ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2TB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 29 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 10.3 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 543 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 923GB free, PID 0216 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 20 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 10.1 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	116x
Xeon W3690Intel $990Bench 77%, 4,808 samples	14x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	8x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	34x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	21x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16