Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 528
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 23
19% 21.3 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunb0w X3 360GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1211A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 282 197 198 199 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 304
Write 300
Mixed 270
SusWrite 228
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 38.1
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 83.7
94% 156 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 181 179 177 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 81
SusWrite 179
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
83GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 90 91 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 101
Write 61.8
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 87.5
106% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK03 1.5TB
554GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 86.3
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 0.5
68% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
External USB3.0 DISK01 500GB
456GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 1.5 1.2 0.4 0.5 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 65.8
Write 62
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 1.5
54% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 89 90 88 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 50
SusWrite 87
104% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback