Powerspec B359

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPowerspec B359  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H81H3-WM
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 03:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4340-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 276
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
AMD(1002 0B42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.76 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 234 230 231 236 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.7% Very good
Read 251
Write 123
Mixed 237
SusWrite 235
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 38.8
135% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 176
136% 184 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 125%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
276GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 20.8
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 25.9
30% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10242397 1302 PSD34G160081 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B359 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Powerspec B359

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback