Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory374.4 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3275M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 946
85% 718 Pts
64-Core 3,723
230% 3,723 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Apple(106B 0212) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.40.01.48
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 108
Parallax 235
113% 161 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 132
Splatting 149
108% 129 fps
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP8192 8TB
6.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 717.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1543 1482 1576 1811 1742 1800 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 113 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 80
Write 108
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 111
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7CPR4N-WM 6x31.8GB
6 of 12 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 65.3
MC Write 100
MC Mixed 70.2
224% 78.6 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 170%
This bench: 186%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 150% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback