QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 03:42
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 34.5
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 97.8
32% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 197
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Canonica VirtIO 107GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 39 41 43 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 84.6
Write 42.2
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 42.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback