Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 435
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 15.3
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 396 403 411 406 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 477
Write 405
Mixed 345
SusWrite 403
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 17.5
94% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 25
77% 159 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-018.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback