Intel W2600CR

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel W2600CR (all builds)
Memory	250.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 10:45
Run Duration	507 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 186 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 781 70% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,924 119% 1,924 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 109 Parallax 93.8 85% 102 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 96.4 Splatting 97 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 388 434 443 438 434 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 444 Mixed 339 SusWrite 428 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 42.2 146% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 162 172% 286 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 4TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 446 454 458 453 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 442 Mixed 393 SusWrite 451 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 48 166% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 167 127% 176 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%
Samsung 860 2TB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 937GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 442 443 457 453 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 457 Mixed 410 SusWrite 449 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 58.2 196% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 273 209% 285 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 119%
Samsung 860 2TB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 452 453 458 454 449 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 422 Mixed 433 SusWrite 453 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 50 167% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 154 119% 164 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 119%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2105 2106 2101 1976 1443 1471 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,432 Write 2,220 Mixed 1,792 SusWrite 1,867 467% 2,078 MB/s	4K Read 61 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 80.6 271% 94.8 MB/s	DQ Read 722 DQ Write 644 DQ Mixed 694 517% 686 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 159GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 289 296 290 295 293 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 404 Mixed 394 SusWrite 310 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 58.6 197% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 287 212% 283 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 274GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2177 833 791 791 790 815 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,470 Write 2,091 Mixed 1,708 SusWrite 1,033 408% 1,826 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 85.5 282% 97.8 MB/s	DQ Read 747 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 710 530% 704 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 1TB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 110GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 458 464 452 462 446 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 414 Mixed 430 SusWrite 455 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 49.6 169% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 172 130% 179 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 43 44 44 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 123 Write 121 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 44.3 97% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 43%
ST2000DX 002-2DV164 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 201GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 133 Write 104 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 0.3 80% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.5 244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 78%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.7 5.7 5 5.2 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 5.3 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.9 48% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 23%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 379GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 137 99 46 27 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 97.2 145% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 61%
ST340062 0AS 400GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 29GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 44 45 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.1% Poor	Read 74 Write 55 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 44.3 69% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 16x16GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 40.4 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 31.3 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W2600CR Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Intel W2600CR

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 01stBench 62%, 884 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	6x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	4x
RX Vega-64AMD $400Bench 87%, 91,676 samples	2x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $171Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $152Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
SSDSC2BA400G3 400GBIntelBench 87%, 389 samples	2x

RAM
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 16x16GBMicronBench 96%, 54 samples	9x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 16x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 85 samples	3x
M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 32GBSamsungBench 44%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $449

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353