MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 08:51
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$266
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 279
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1003
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,494
92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 147
Parallax 156
126% 153 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,521
Write 2248
Mixed 1852
491% 2,207 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 81.6
271% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1271
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 972
773% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 9TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 313 305 231 251 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 461
Mixed 421
SusWrite 279
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 39.9
148% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 68.2
88% 162 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90%
Great: 131%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
309GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 242 257 285 241 292 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 108%
ASMT 2115 750GB
201GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 75 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 60.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 73.9
89% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 45%
FUJITSU MHV2080BH 80GB
74GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 27.4
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 28.1
34% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 6,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17) - $450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $1,122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback