Today's hottest deals

Samsung R780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R780  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R780
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 58.8
47% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 184
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 1.31
3% 3.18 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 196 196 178 198 198 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 206
Write 182
Mixed 172
SusWrite 192
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 11.8
43% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 163
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 101%
WDC WD20 EADS-00S2B0 2TB
651GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.2 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.09% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 6.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.9
7% 5.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273BH1-CF8 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R780 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback