Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 02:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 132
57% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.14 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 12 30 46 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 84
Write 86.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 38.6
49% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
118GB free
Firmware: 1AC01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 80 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 49
Mixed 58
SusWrite 81.1
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
WD 3200AAC External 320GB
156GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 27.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 28.1
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback