ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '17 at 06:58
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 61 2-Core 103 52% 81.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 196 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.47% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 13.4 9% 11.2 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 13.8 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BF240A4H 240GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 185GB free Firmware: LH6i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -134028749438755 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 774 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 774 (B7) Unknown 100 100 635 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 29 57 68723212317 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 774 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5123 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 82557 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 51 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 82557 (F2) Unknown 100 100 89431 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2413	73.5% Very good	Read 493 Write 242 Mixed 266 73% 334 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 20.4 105% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 62.1 78% 140 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 83%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79 10,862 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1399 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1478 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 20 (A8) Unknown 100 100 102 (A9) Unknown 100 100 395 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 29 (AE) Unknown 100 100 736 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 67 48 206159544353 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 5 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 96 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 7666 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5091 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7553 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	90.4% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 451 Mixed 423 103% 461 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 26 113% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 63.6 82% 150 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 176 5991 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1699 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5432 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 862 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 173 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 61022 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.6% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 90 Mixed 97.6 70% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.27 106% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 83%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 506GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8816 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4770 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14831 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2559 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 676 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4093 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	78.6% Very good	Read 159 Write 115 Mixed 118 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.45 127% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 85%
BUFFALO External HDD 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 170% 238GB free, PID 01f0 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 196 Mixed 181 246% 192 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 15 1,725% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 15.9 2,208% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 180%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 13.4 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 11 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

CPU
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	23x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	9x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	9x

GPU
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	12x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	9x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x

SSD
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $72Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x
M550 mSATA 512GBCrucial $458Bench 87%, 441 samples	4x

RAM
99P5471-002.A 4x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 47 samples	4x
SHARETRONIC 1x4GBUnknownBench 27%, 954 samples	4x
DDR3 1600G 4x2GBAdataBench 43%, 200 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback