Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime25.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 12:14
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 427
49% 384 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 46.8
48% 50 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 48.5
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 199 147 32 32 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 130
Write 98
Mixed 83
SusWrite 106
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 9.7
38% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 13.6
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
267GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 121 113 121 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 110
Write 139
Mixed 68
SusWrite 118
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
43GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 104 111 86 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 87.2
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
34GB free, PID 6332
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 17.7
25% 18 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.4
226% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback